|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Botswana: the closed paradise (2003) What does the world know of Botswana? Pictures of George Bush’s summer trip to Africa were flashed across the region. In Johannesburg, the most popular image was Bush’s visit to a Botswanan safari. Dubya spent just forty-five minutes among the elephants of Gaberone, far less than Bill Clinton, who had the grace to stay overnight. The South African press delighted at one obstacle met by the Presidential cavalcade. The most powerful man in the world parked his car for five minutes and waited patiently, rather than disturb two elephants, rutting in the mid-afternoon sun.
In September, a different image was sent out.
Reports came out of a 300-mile electric fence, which the government
is erecting along the border with Zimbabwe.
The Botswanan government has denied that this eight-feet high
barrier is aimed against people. The
target is livestock. But
these are strange animals, whose routes need to be guarded by immigration
officers, army and police. The
desert paradise has a different side.
Poor Zimbabweans are excluded, while rich western tourists remain
welcome. Their dollars help
to keep the Botswanan economy afloat.
Spending
his time with the country’s elite, George Bush missed out on the
opportunity to experience the real highlight of Botswanan tourism, the
Okavango delta. Formed by
rainwater running South and East from Angola, the delta consists of some
sixteen thousand square kilometers of water, situated right in the middle
of the Kalahari desert. It is
an extraordinarily fertile landscape of grass, papyrus and wetland trees.
A magnet for crocodiles, hippopotamus, cattle, deer and a dozen
unique species of African birds, the network of islands and narrow rivers
remains wet (at least in its Northern uplands) right throughout the year.
The history of Botswana predates colonialism.
Stone tools and axes have been found in the delta region from up to
thirty thousand years ago. The
country is as large as France, but its population is less than two
million. In the seventeenth
and eighteenth centuries, the Tswana people enjoyed a form of federation.
Conflicts over land or property were resolved without violence.
Those involved in disputes simply departed for unoccupied regions.
The region became a unitary state, only in response to
encroachments by European settlers from the couth.
Later,
Botswana became something of a labour reserve.
By the 1940s, over half of the national income came in the form of
remittances from migrant workers in South Africa or Zimbabwe.
Having traveled east to work on tobacco plantations, the children
of migrant labourers are determined to keep their onet-time hosts out.
Diamonds were found in Botswana in 1967, copper is mined there
today, and soda ash gathered on the salt flatlands.
The Botswanan economy enjoys large currency reserves and a stable
currency. It is easy to see
why Bush was so keen to do business.
The country has never been at war, and has only had an army since
the late 1970s. Since independence, the moderate Democratic Party has ruled
Botswana continuously and without serious challenge.
Trips to the Okavango tend to begin in Maun (pronounced Ma-oon in
Tswana, Maarn by whites), a town of around 50,000 people packed with bars,
clubs, sports halls and tourist camps.
One friend dubs it, ‘a drinking town with a safari problem'.
The heart of the local economy is formed by a tar road, constructed
only in the last ten years with the help of Asian migrant labour.
The local banks still quote exchange rates for Hong Kong dollars
and Japanese Yen, although not Zimbabwean currency or travelers’ cheques,
‘as there is no demand for their resale’.
Visiting
Maun is in some ways like watching the industrial revolution in progress,
as clusters of developed business interact, including a new transport
company, building firms, Toyota franchises, supermarkets, a new warehouse,
educational and training consultancies.
The other obvious comparison is with apartheid-era South Africa.
Afrikaans is widely spoken, and an acknowledged segregation
is practiced in terms of housing and all forms of social life. The
local paper, The Ngami Times, reports the introduction of permits
for construction companies, accused of pumping water from the local hippo
pool. Another story defends
the publication of an article reporting the death of a tourist at the
hands of fifteen lions. The
tour companies had argued that such bad news should not appear in print.
The Ngami Times supports its decision, but cautiously.
‘This newspaper defends the tourism industry through and through
and the industry knows it too’. The headline story reports that the Paramount Chief of the
Batawana (Tawana II) has decided to abdicate, in order to begin a
political career. His three
year old son Tawana III has already been appointed as the King’s
successor.
One topic of discussion at night is the condition of the Okavango
river. For if the waters
fail, then tourism will dry up, and the economy suffer accordingly.
The size of the town has perhaps trebled in the last ten years,
while the number of visitors to the delta has risen similarly.
Before 1989, Maun itself used to have the river flowing through it
all year round, and since then the waters have been receding.
The second common talking point is the indolence of native labour.
White foremen, escaping at night-time to the bars, report on the
impossibility of educating Botswanan workers into the disciplines of
modern work. 'Too many people
own their own land. When they
get bored of working for you, they just go home.'
The sniggers that follow are only recycled versions of old
Johannesburg jokes. At
the edges of the bars, however, black faces are listening.
In Zimbabwe and South Africa, the casual racism of most whites led
necessarily to collective black rebellion. In
Botswana, by contrast, the hatred has been turned from the outside in.
Alfred Dube, Botswanan representative to the United Nations was
quoted justifying his country's 'apartheid wall', by arguing that all
Zimbabweans were criminals or worse.
'It is very unfortunate that we have our houses being burgled every
day and our children harassed ... The
Zimbabweans must go.'
The seething takes place against a background of splendour.
A network of tourist camps crosses the Okavango.
The nearest of them can be reached by car, but the most common
means of arrival is by plane. Visitors
are then boated along the river on flat mekoro dugout canoes, quiet
enough not to disturb elephants or lion drinking at the waterfront. A week at the grandest elephant camps might set you back as
much as twenty thousand US dollars. I
stay with friends in Nxamasaire, a more affordable, but hardly modest camp
built at tree level from pines and teak. The
only other guests are a team from the National Geographic filming
crocodiles. They depart at
ten each winter evening in order to catch the reptiles at their calmest.
In the trees we spot bush babies, a tiny monkey species.
They follow the vines downwards in search of food, before
scampering back up to safety. My
own sleep is disturbed by hippo chuntering in the river outside.
We fish on the river, looking for cheap bribes to offer the local
eagle, Jeffrey. Even
in the middle of winter, the temperature tops thirty centigrade in the
day. Indeed it is this which
explains the unique charm of the Okavango, the realisation that in our
paradise of cool, running water, we are never more than half a day’s
travel from a different environment, the dry dust of the desert sands.
For decades, the government has been trying to stop the migration
of animals across the desert, hoping in this way to secure the
continuation of the water supply. Even when this policy was applied simply to nature, its
results were mixed. Herds
were divided, established watering homes turned to dust.
Environmentalists have been campaigning for years to have the
fences torn down. With
people, meanwhile, any such division is more deadly.
But when Europe is so adamant that all new arrivals must be
excluded, who can blame Botswana for following that lead?
|